The analysis and evaluation on the features of the heavy metals in coal mining soil in the middle reaches of the Yellow River

WANG Chunguang; PENG Jingsong; LI Wanying; LI Jian; ZHANG Shuangteng; YU Yang

doi:10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.05.021

Mining Safety & Environmental Protection > 2022 > 49(5): 124-130. > DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.05.021

WANG Chunguang, PENG Jingsong, LI Wanying, LI Jian, ZHANG Shuangteng, YU Yang. The analysis and evaluation on the features of the heavy metals in coal mining soil in the middle reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2022, 49(5): 124-130. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.05.021

Citation:

PDF (2720 KB)

The analysis and evaluation on the features of the heavy metals in coal mining soil in the middle reaches of the Yellow River

1.
Geological Institute of China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau, Beijing 100101, China
2.
Echnology Innovation Center for Ecological Restoration Engineering in Mining Area, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China
3.
Guangzhou Institute of Technology, Guangzhou 510075, China
4.
China Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China
5.
Key Laboratory of Mine Ecological Effects and Systematic Restoration, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China

More Information

Received Date: December 07, 2021
Revised Date: April 11, 2022
Available Online: November 27, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the investigation of the soil environments in the important coal mines in Shenmu City which locates in the middle reaches of the Yellow River, the contents and spatial distribution features of the heavy metals in the soil were studied by means of the enrichment factor method and the potential ecological hazard index method. The results are as follows: ①Only the variation coefficient of Ni element is above 50% in the area under study; the average values of Cd, Hg and Ni are higher than those of the soil background value of China and Shaanxi respectively; the heavy metals in the soil do not exceed the standard value; the distribution of Hg, Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr and Zn elements in the area under study is generally high in the north and low in the south, and the high values are mainly distributed in the north.②The enrichment degree of heavy metals in the area under study is Hg > Cd > Pb > Cr > Zn > As > Ni, and the potential ecological risk is Hg > Cd > As > Cu > Pb > Ni > Cr > Zn; the comprehensive potential ecological risk is moderate, except Hg and Cd, the ecological risk of the other six heavy metals is low. The research results can provide effective reference for carrying out production, ecological protection and restoration of mines under construction, and supporting ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin.
- mine soil,
- heavy metal,
- dynamic monitoring,
- ecological risk,
- ecological restoration

FullText(HTML)

References (34)

References

[1]	张进德, 郗富瑞. 我国废弃矿山生态修复研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21): 7921-7930. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXB202021034.htm
[2]	付英. 建设人与自然和谐共生的现代化矿业[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(7): 9-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ202107003.htm
[3]	张进德, 田磊, 裴圣良. 矿山水土污染与防治对策研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(2): 157-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG202102019.htm
[4]	张成业, 李军, 雷少刚, 等. 矿区生态环境定量遥感监测研究进展与展望[J]. 金属矿山, 2022(3): 1-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSKS202203032.htm
[5]	顾一芳, 冯启言, 孟磊, 等. 河北省关闭煤矿地质环境影响评价[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2021, 48(5): 118-121. https://ener.cbpt.cnki.net/WKB/WebPublication/paperDigest.aspx?paperID=dc11d1df-f6bd-43ef-a068-37a12fdf5afd
[6]	叶珊珊, 张进德, 潘莉, 等. 基于"绿色矿山"的矿区生态环境成本核算——以华北平原某矿区为例[J]. 金属矿山, 2019(4): 168-174. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSKS201904032.htm
[7]	余洋, 张进德, 潘莉. 土地整治综合研究进展评述[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2018, 35(5): 34-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKG201805005.htm
[8]	郭冬艳, 杨繁, 高兵, 等. 矿山生态修复助力碳中和的政策建议[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(10): 50-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ202110009.htm
[9]	李瑜, 谭林, 严明书, 等. 重庆市土地质量地质调查成果转化存在问题与对策建议[J]. 国土资源情报, 2020(7): 50-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GTZQ202007009.htm
[10]	彭丽梅, 赵理, 周悟, 等. 基于层次分析法的耕地土壤重金属污染风险区域划分[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(5): 61-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGXB202005009.htm
[11]	王娜, 田磊, 文可戈, 等. 基于遥感技术的矿山生态修复调查研究——以冀东铁矿为例[J]. 金属矿山, 2021(10): 192-198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSKS202110027.htm
[12]	于辉胜, 翟世斌, 王力, 等. 废弃露天矿山生态保护修复实践研究——以卡顶山矿区生态修复工程为例[J]. 国土资源情报, 2021(8): 50-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GTZQ202108009.htm
[13]	于辉胜. 区域性废弃矿山生态修复实践与思考[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(6): 84-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDKJ202106014.htm
[14]	谢放放, 李保莲, 焦俊党, 等. 开采沉陷区土壤特性空间变化及其作物响应[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(4): 89-97. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGXB202104010.htm
[15]	董燕, 孙璐, 李海涛, 等. 雄安新区土壤重金属和砷元素空间分布特征及源解析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(3): 172-181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG202103022.htm
[16]	张沛沛, 余洋. 采煤沉陷对土壤团聚体及其有机碳的影响[J]. 金属矿山, 2020(12): 203-209. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSKS202012033.htm
[17]	王敏, 阎蓓蓓, 秦鹏一, 等. 滕州表层土壤重金属累积特征及来源分析[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(1): 60-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGXB202001008.htm
[18]	安永龙, 万利勤, 李霞, 等. 承德市土壤重金属空间结构与分布特征[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2020, 47(6): 119-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG202006015.htm
[19]	李丽, 杨金中, 陈栋, 等. 长江经济带江苏段废弃露天矿山分布与生态修复遥感调查研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(1): 183-190. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG202201021.htm
[20]	王玮, 徐庆荣, 李书钦. 某地下矿山开采对土壤环境影响研究[J]. 现代矿业, 2021, 37(12): 1-3. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYKB202112001.htm
[21]	杨帆, 王京彬, 王晨昇, 等. 承德市富硒土壤区镉的地球化学特征及生态风险评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2020, 47(6): 163-172. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG202006019.htm
[22]	卢飞, 辜小花, 陈双扣, 等. 璧南河流域水质评价与污染源解析[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 23(6): 101-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CQSG202106021.htm
[23]	孙雪亮, 赵建港, 余勤飞, 等. 新疆某露天矿排土场土壤质量分级评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2021(8): 178-185. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSKS202108029.htm
[24]	史帅航, 白甲林, 余洋. 西南地区某矿产集采区土壤重金属迁移规律及生态风险评价[J]. 金属矿山, 2022(2): 194-200. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSKS202202026.htm
[25]	崔潇, 周妍如, 刘孝阳, 等. 平朔露天煤矿复垦区不同地质层组岩土质量综合评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021, 48(2): 164-173. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG202102020.htm
[26]	秦越强, 王志民, 周业泽, 等. 准格尔旗煤炭矿集区生态环境问题与修复措施[J]. 现代矿业, 2021, 37(6): 169-174. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYKB202106049.htm
[27]	范余敏, 李向阳, 李梦, 等. 黄河中游三门峡市矿山生态环境承载力分区研究[J]. 国土资源情报, 2022(1): 30-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GTZQ202201006.htm
[28]	石菊松, 马小霞. 关于青藏高原生态保护治理的几点思考和建议[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2021, 46(5): 42-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKD202105008.htm
[29]	王丽, 王力, 和文祥, 等. 神木煤矿区土壤重金属污染特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(8/9): 1343-1347. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ2011Z2028.htm
[30]	国家环境保护局, 中国环境监测总站. 中国土壤元素背景值[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990.
[31]	滕彦国, 庹先国, 倪师军, 等. 攀枝花工矿区土壤重金属人为污染的富集因子分析[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(1): 13-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRYJ200201003.htm
[32]	李娟娟, 马金涛, 楚秀娟, 等. 应用地积累指数法和富集因子法对铜矿区土壤重金属污染的安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(12): 135-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK200612024.htm
[33]	徐争启, 倪师军, 庹先国, 等. 潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2008, 31(2): 112-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJKS200802029.htm
[34]	钟明, 万云, 万安, 等. 沙颍河流域沉积物重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(7): 1857-1864. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STXZ201607024.htm

[1]	YU Weijian, SUN Meilin, DU Jinying, CHEN Guoliang, WANG Chuang. Research progress on approach for ecological restoration of mine, emission reduction and carbon sink growth under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2025, 52(1): 38-46. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.20240217
[2]	QIAO Xueyuan, WANG Xiankai, CHEN Xiang, DONG Bin, LI Chong. Research advances of municipal sludge used in mine ecological restoration of mine abandoned land[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2024, 51(6): 154-160. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.20230637
[3]	GUO Yangnan, TANG Jiajia, YANG Yongjun, LI Zhiwei, LEI Shaogang. Using LiDAR to reveal the canopy structure differentiation of artificially restored plant communities in coal mining subsidence area[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(6): 37-41，47. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.06.006
[4]	HOU Jinwu, YU Yang. Discourse on scientific advancements in mining ecological restoration[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(6): 1-6，15. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.06.001
[5]	ZHONG Anya, SUN Juan, HU Chunming, GU Haihong. Evaluation and prediction of ecological environment restoration effect of Beijing Wangping Coal Mine based on RSEI[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(4): 89-96. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.04.015
[6]	MENG Qingjun, HAN Xiaoyu, SONG Chao, ZHU Xueqiang, QIN Dongfu, LI Ang, FENG Qiyan. Characteristics of soil fertility and selection of suitable plants for ecological restoration in Lingquan closed open-pit coal mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(3): 136-144. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.03.023
[7]	ZHANG Haizhen, WANG Lin, NIE Qingli. Study on the ecological restoration strategy and method of closed coal mine wasteland in Chongqing based on interference theory[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2020, 47(4): 122-126. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2020.04.024
[8]	XUE Chongyi, XUE Ye, JI Xiaodong. Study on dynamic evolution of social-ecological system risk in CBM development based on Choquet-Brusselator[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2020, 47(4): 116-121. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2020.04.023
[9]	WANG Shihu. Environmental Problems and Countermeasures of Legacy Abandoned Mine under the Background of Ecological Civilization Construction[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2018, 45(6): 88-91,96.
[10]	HU Feng, WANG Xinglei, LIU Shihui, LIU Gongbin. Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution of Soil in Yili Mining Area[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2018, 45(1): 69-73.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(21)

1.	李军，高占栋，马利邦，脱新颖，周发元，李旭，马晓红，臧飞. 黄河上游白银段煤矿区周边土壤重金属累积特征、污染风险与溯源解析. 环境科学. 2025(04): 2475-2485 .
2.	李明，王平，胡晓生，温晖. 刍议新时期生态保护修复创新路径. 世界有色金属. 2024(01): 208-210 .
3.	胡晓生，李明，王平. 基于国土空间生态修复下的生物技术方法探讨. 世界有色金属. 2024(02): 137-139 .
4.	李国营，李瑞冬，李文彦. 人工智能背景下生态修复规划发展路径探析. 世界有色金属. 2024(08): 177-180 .
5.	刘栋永. 人工智能在水文地质调查过程中的战略意义探索. 世界有色金属. 2024(10): 166-168 .
6.	王昕，卿三成，薛广海，吴萌，潘社卫. 自然修复下长停产矿山土壤重金属污染特征及风险消除研究. 环境保护科学. 2024(04): 163-168 .
7.	叶小兰，王婷婷，宁迪. 基于新质生产力视角下矿山生态保护修复. 世界有色金属. 2024(12): 205-207 .
8.	徐荣强，张宇. 矿区生态保护修复优势技术评述. 世界有色金属. 2024(16): 190-193 .
9.	王丹，强晓龙，吴嘉乐，赵文博. 新质生产力背景下地质调查战略转型路径探索. 世界有色金属. 2024(20): 201-203 .
10.	王鹏，刘军省，王春光，鞠林雪，迟昊轩，丁一，余洋. 河西走廊耕地集约利用水平与耕地生态效率耦合协调测度. 自然资源情报. 2024(12): 25-33 .
11.	张学虎，夏南. 矿山生态环境影响评价研究进展. 世界有色金属. 2023(04): 153-156 .
12.	刘国伟，夏南. 刍议生态文明背景下矿山生态修复成本核算. 世界有色金属. 2023(07): 199-201 .
13.	孙骥宇. 科学计量：“智慧矿山”研究进展——基于2010-2021年CNKI期刊文献统计. 世界有色金属. 2023(08): 154-157 .
14.	曾文浩，宁迪，刘国伟. 基于遥感技术的矿山地质环境监测实践. 中国资源综合利用. 2023(07): 132-139 .
15.	殷亚秋，夏南，丁晓东，王敬，穆泳林. 海南岛尾矿库遥感调查与综合治理建议. 世界有色金属. 2023(10): 139-141 .
16.	LIU Ben，LIU Ying，WU Jia-long，ZHONG Min，DING Yi. Coordination of urbanization and cultivated land resources in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area:A case study of Guangzhou City. Ecological Economy. 2023(03): 233-243 .
17.	韦凯耀，刘志民，梁晨，张杰，马强. 铬污染场迁移特性及双频激电监测技术研究. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(12): 145-156 .
18.	侯金武，余洋. 试论科学推进矿山生态修复. 矿业安全与环保. 2023(06): 1-6+15 . 本站查看
19.	李大猛，孙东，余辉，李松，张正鹏. 绿色矿山建设与矿山生态修复关联探析. 世界有色金属. 2023(22): 162-165 .
20.	吴赛男. 刍议矿山生态修复的发展方向与实践路径. 世界有色金属. 2023(23): 196-198 .
21.	王俊桃，吴赛男，高乃昌，余洋. 基于生态修复背景下的矿山地质公园建设与开发. 世界有色金属. 2023(24): 208-210 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (85) PDF downloads (14) Cited by(22)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The analysis and evaluation on the features of the heavy metals in coal mining soil in the middle reaches of the Yellow River