Optimization of early prediction index for spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam in Jianbei Coal Mine

WEN Hu; GUO Ximan; ZHANG Duo; CHENG Xiaojiao; WEI Gaoming; TANG Rui

doi:10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.03.001

Mining Safety & Environmental Protection > 2022 > 49(3): 1-8. > DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.03.001

WEN Hu, GUO Ximan, ZHANG Duo, CHENG Xiaojiao, WEI Gaoming, TANG Rui. Optimization of early prediction index for spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam in Jianbei Coal Mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2022, 49(3): 1-8. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.03.001

Citation:

PDF (1935 KB)

Optimization of early prediction index for spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam in Jianbei Coal Mine

WEN Hu^{1, 2,},
GUO Ximan¹,
ZHANG Duo¹,
CHENG Xiaojiao^{1, 2},
WEI Gaoming¹,
TANG Rui¹

1.
School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Western Mine Exploitation and Hazard Prevention, Ministry of Education, Xi'an 710054, China

More Information

Received Date: August 26, 2021
Revised Date: September 27, 2021
Available Online: September 06, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to solve the problem of early accurate prediction of spontaneous combustion in gassy coal seam of Jianbei Coal Mine, taking the coal seam of 4204 working face of the mine as the research object, the programmed temperature test was mainly used to analyze the variation law of CO, CO₂, C₂H₆, C₂H₄ gas volume fraction in the process of temperature rising oxidation of coal samples with different particle sizes, and the treatment and analysis were carried out by means of Grignard fire coefficient. The results show that the critical temperature of CO in Jianbei Coal Mine is 60 ℃ to 80 ℃, and the overall change trend is growing exponentially, and the relationship between CO gas production and particle size is inversely proportional; the temperature at which C₂H₄ appears is about 120 ℃, and the smaller the coal particle size is, the faster the volume fraction increases.According to the principle of index gas optimization, the optimal indexes of spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam in 4204 working face of Jianbei Coal Mine are determined as follows: CO and the second type fire coefficient are the main gas indexes; C₂H₄, alkene ratio φ(C₂H₄)/ φ(CH₄) and φ(C₂H₄) / φ(C₂H₆), and the third type of fire coefficient are auxiliary gas indexes. The gas index CO and coal temperature are used for function fitting to further verify the degree of coal spontaneous combustion. The research results provides a theoretical basis for the prediction of spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam in Jianbei Coal Mine, and has important guiding significance for the early prediction and advanced prevention and control of spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam under similar working conditions in China.
- gassy coal seam,
- coal spontaneous combustion,
- temperature programmed,
- Grignard fire coefficient,
- index gas

FullText(HTML)

References (20)

References

[1]	王宪光, 陈志平, 龚邦军. 高瓦斯易自燃综放面采空区内因火灾防控[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2021(10): 146-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CXYY202110043.htm
[2]	邓军, 李贝, 李珍宝, 等. 预报煤自燃的气体指标优选试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2014, 42(1): 55-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201401017.htm
[3]	秦波涛, 仲晓星, 王德明, 等. 煤自燃过程特性及防治技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(1): 66-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ202101005.htm
[4]	岳宁芳, 金彦, 孙明福, 等. 基于多指标气体的煤自燃进程分级预警研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(6): 2139-2146. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AQHJ202006014.htm
[5]	周清清, 刘建忠, 袁绍, 等. 煤自燃倾向性测试方法研究进展[J]. 热力发电, 2017, 46(10): 1-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RLFD201710001.htm
[6]	王德明, 邵振鲁, 朱云飞. 煤矿热动力重大灾害中的几个科学问题[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(1): 57-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB202101006.htm
[7]	邬剑明, 彭举, 吴玉国. 平朔矿区煤自然发火指标气体选择的试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2012, 40(2): 67-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201202020.htm
[8]	唐洪, 郭军, 刘荫, 等. 高地温条件下的煤自燃预报指标优选实验研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2018, 49(6): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKAQ201806004.htm
[9]	GUO X Y, DENG C B, ZHANG X, et al. Formation law of hydrocarbon index gases during coal spontaneous combustion in an oxygen-poor environment[J]. Energy Sources, 2019, 41(1-6): 626-635.
[10]	宋万新, 杨胜强, 朱玲方. 立体抽采条件下高瓦斯采空区煤自燃危险性预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(4): 48-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201204010.htm
[11]	王怡, 谢军, 任广意. 采空区遗煤自然发火的指标气体研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2020, 40(10): 118-122. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYYK202010022.htm
[12]	邓军, 白祖锦, 肖旸, 等. 煤自燃指标体系试验研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(5): 1756-1761. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AQHJ201805018.htm
[13]	WANG C P, ZHAO X Y, BAI Z J, et al. Comprehensive index evaluation of the spontaneous combustion capability of different ranks of coal[J]. Fuel, 2021, 291: 120087.
[14]	ZENG J, FANG L F, LI Q S, et al. Assessment of coal spontaneous combustion prediction index gases for coal with different moisture contents[J]. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects, 2021: 1-13.
[15]	王福生, 王建涛, 顾亮, 等. 煤自燃预测预报多参数指标体系研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(6): 45-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDBK201806007.htm
[16]	文虎, 赵向涛, 王伟峰, 等. 不同煤体自燃指标性气体函数模型特征分析[J]. 煤炭转化, 2020, 43(1): 16-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTZH202001003.htm
[17]	赵婧昱, 张宇轩, 宋佳佳, 等. 高温贫氧下不同温度阶段煤体自燃指标气体测试[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2019, 39(2): 189-193. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXB201902002.htm
[18]	周亮, 戴广龙, 秦汝祥. 高瓦斯易自燃煤层采空区遗煤自燃影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 122-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201802021.htm
[19]	申岩峰, 王美君, HU Yongfeng, 等. 高硫炼焦煤化学结构及硫赋存形态对硫热变迁的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2020, 48(2): 144-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RLHX202002003.htm
[20]	张帆. 煤自然发火实验及数值模拟研究[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2019.

[1]	LI Shangguo. Research on the prediction technology of “temperature-gas” double index cycle feedback for spontaneous combustion of coal in goaf[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2025, 52(1): 90-94. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.20230712
[2]	WANG Yi, ZHOU Yu, LUO Guang, ZHANG Dingshan, CHEN Zhanquan. Study on signature gas and critical value of spontaneous combustion in K1 coal seam of Longtan Coal Mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(6): 98-103. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.06.016
[3]	ZHANG Yilong, WU Yan, FANG Shuhao, LIAO Qi, YANG Yinchao, ZHU Hongqing. Determination of sensitive index for prediction of coal outburst risk in Chiyu Coal Mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2022, 49(3): 84-87, 93. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2022.03.014
[4]	LUO Dayong, LIU Zhen. Optimization and application of coal spontaneous combustion index gas in Xutuan Coal Mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2021, 48(5): 69-74. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2021.05.014
[5]	QI Liming, LU Yunting, GUAN Lianhe, QI Ming. Exploration and application of determination method of sensitive index for prediction of coal and gas outburst[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2021, 48(3): 85-89. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2021.03.016
[6]	ZHANG Yuzhu. Study on critical value of K₁ of outburst risk prediction index of working face[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2020, 47(6): 94-97. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2020.06.018
[7]	ZHANG Zhaoyi. Determine the Sensitive Index and Critical Value of Coal and Gas Outburst of Fracturing Coal Mass[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2019, 46(6): 93-97.
[8]	ZHAO Xusheng, MA Guolong, QIAO Wei, NING Xiaoliang. Early-warning Index System of Coal and Gas Outburst based on Fault Tree Analysis[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2019, 46(3): 37-43.
[9]	DONG Shaopu, LIU Jian, LI Yanchang, BAI Xuesong, LIU Qinghai. Experimental Research on Indicator Gas Spontaneous Combustion in Dongrong No.1 Coal Mine based on Principal Component Analysis[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2019, 46(2): 1-5.
[10]	GAO Junwei. Study on Critical Value of Inspection Index of Gas Pre-drainage Effect in Three-soft Seam in West Henan Coal Field[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2017, 44(6): 54-58.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(15)

1.	张诺，江成玉，张毅，覃晓波. 贵州某矿采空区标志性气体优选及自燃“三带”划分. 煤. 2024(05): 23-27+31 .
2.	李艳昌，张连超，陶华焕. 铁北煤矿褐煤自燃预测函数模型研究. 工业安全与环保. 2024(06): 28-31 .
3.	虎晓龙，朱德清，张海洋，张羽琛，翟小伟，杨冲，任立峰，马腾. 灵新煤矿煤自然发火规律及指标气体研究. 煤. 2023(02): 1-5+10 .
4.	迟克勇，范耀庭，王晨，王俊峰，李小平. 空气湿度对煤自燃特征参数及热效应的影响研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2023(03): 74-80 . 本站查看
5.	丰安祥，周言安，叶春辉，陈玉良，李毅恒，张文昭. 采空区煤自燃分级协同防控方法研究与应用. 煤炭技术. 2023(07): 131-135 .
6.	吴培益. 林西矿8煤层自然发火指标气体预测体系研究. 煤炭与化工. 2023(06): 92-96 .
7.	邱常青. 高瓦斯矿煤自燃标志气体生成规律与分级预警方法研究. 煤. 2023(08): 71-74 .
8.	文虎，黄剑，赵炬，张铎，黎杰. 基于FLUENT的气化灰渣灌浆输送特性模拟. 煤炭技术. 2023(09): 119-124 .
9.	惠金卫，俞鑫，马小卫，梁正，王峰，田志惠. 大倾角特厚煤层自燃与冲击地压控制机制研究. 煤炭技术. 2023(09): 182-186 .
10.	姜浩. 风水沟煤矿6煤层煤自燃阻化性能测试. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2023(15): 58-60 .
11.	藏亮. 煤自燃动力学参数及氧化反应阶段实验研究. 中国矿业. 2023(10): 165-172 .
12.	邢婧. 不同变质程度煤样活性基团变化与传热特性研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2023(05): 82-87 . 本站查看
13.	陈德山，杨婉欣，贾永磊，焦健. 突出煤层煤自燃早期预报指标优选研究. 现代矿业. 2023(10): 201-206 .
14.	武帅，赵晓夏. 易燃煤层综放工作面撤架期间防灭火高效阻化技术研究. 煤炭技术. 2023(12): 212-215 .
15.	江莉娟，邓存宝，王彩萍，雷昌奎，年军. 煤自燃指标气体分析与分级预警. 西安科技大学学报. 2023(06): 1088-1098 .

Other cited types(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (81) PDF downloads (19) Cited by(19)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Optimization of early prediction index for spontaneous combustion of gassy coal seam in Jianbei Coal Mine