Citation: | TIAN Shuicheng, CAI Xinfu, ZHAO Zhaoying, SUN Wen, FAN Binbin, GAO Ling. Research on evolutionary game of miners' unsafe emotional state management[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(3): 145-150. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.03.024 |
In view of the impact of miners' unsafe emotional state on safety production, evolutionary game theory and numerical simulation methods were used to introduce factors such as cost, reward, potential risk perception, practitioners' reputation evaluation of safety inspectors and safety supervision value, and to build an evolutionary game model of "practitioners-safety inspectors-coal mine enterprises". Through the analysis of the influence of each impact factor on the possibility of three-party strategy choice, the influence relationship of the strategy choice of cooperation between enterprises was discussed. The results show that the miners' strategy choice has a positive correlation with personal risk perception ability, and a negative correlation with the complaint cost. The selection of security inspectors' strategies is greatly affected by the evaluation constraints of practitioners, the probability of security inspectors' strategy selection is negatively correlated with the benefits lost by practitioners' negative evaluations, and is positively correlated with the personal value and safety supervision value brought by positive evaluations. The cost of enterprise security input is negatively correlated with the stability of strategy evolution.
[1] |
田水承, 杨鹏飞, 李磊, 等. 矿工不良情绪影响因素及干预对策研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2016, 43(6): 99-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ENER201606026.htm
|
[2] |
田水承, 孙璐瑶, 唐艺璇, 等. 矿工不安全状态评价指标体系的构建与分析[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2021, 41(3): 402-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXB202103004.htm
|
[3] |
马亚静. 矿工情绪与安全问题研究[J]. 中国煤炭, 2007(1): 60-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGME200701022.htm
|
[4] |
林健, 栗继祖. 复杂适应系统视角下矿工自制力影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(12): 163-168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDBK201912032.htm
|
[5] |
陈红, 张珣, 伊娜. 矿工心理安全感的群体差异及管理对策[J]. 煤矿安全, 2014, 45(6): 237-240. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKAQ201406069.htm
|
[6] |
程根银, 陈绍杰, 魏志勇, 等. 井下噪声对人心理生理影响分析[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2011, 31(6): 850-853. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXB201106045.htm
|
[7] |
王浩, 蒋承林, 史莉莉. 煤矿井下噪声危害分析及对策[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(12): 183-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDBK201112040.htm
|
[8] |
吴信科, 周进生, 徐友宁. 基于博弈理论的绿色矿山建设联动机制[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(1): 102-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201901019.htm
|
[9] |
马媛, 潘亚君. 煤炭绿色开采技术推动策略研究: 基于政府与企业的演化博弈视角[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(10): 97-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKA201910017.htm
|
[10] |
张伟, 张金锁, 刘杰. 基于演化博弈的煤炭资源绿色开采监管策略研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2016, 36(3): 349-355. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKXB201603011.htm
|
[11] |
杨雪, 田阳, 仝凤鸣. 基于进化博弈的矿工情绪监管与不安全行为研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2018, 49(8): 299-302. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKAQ201808078.htm
|
[12] |
冯念青, 杨舒婷. 矿工心理援助与不安全行为系统动力学分析[J]. 煤炭技术, 2021, 40(7): 210-212. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTJS202107060.htm
|
[13] |
张颖, 冀巨海. 矿工违章作业演化博弈分析: 计划行为理论视角[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2021, 48(1): 126-130. doi: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2021.01.024
|
[14] |
朱亮. 基于纳什均衡理论的煤炭供应链生态及博弈策略探讨[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2016, 38(5): 74-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDYS201605016.htm
|
[15] |
TAYLOR P D, JONKER L B. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics[J]. Mathematical Bioscience, 1978, 40: 145-156. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0025556478900779
|
[16] |
FRIEDMAN D. On economic applications of evolutionary game theory[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1998, 8(1): 15-43. doi: 10.1007/s001910050054
|
[17] |
李壮阔, 吕亚兰. PPP项目多主体行为策略演化博弈研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2019, 49(23): 31-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SSJS201923004.htm
|
[18] |
赵梓焱. 基于成本收益的矿工不安全行为多主体模型构建与分析[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2018.
|
1. |
李琰,肖雨晨. 情绪因素影响下的煤矿企业冲突管理演化博弈分析. 煤炭工程. 2024(01): 207-213 .
![]() | |
2. |
陈子涵,李磊,赵奕博,张作作,李睿涵,李浩. 非正式组织视角下煤矿工人不安全行为影响因素识别. 西安科技大学学报. 2023(05): 854-862 .
![]() |