Damage-seepage Model of Borehole Coal and Its Application for Pressure Relief in Gas Extraction of Coal Seam
-
摘要: 为对比分析顺层钻孔在护孔和未护孔条件下的抽采效果,考虑煤体扩容特性,采用煤体孔隙率和渗透率动态数学模型,结合D-P屈服准则,建立了钻孔煤体破坏—渗流的流固耦合模型。以超化煤矿2煤层相关物理参数为基础,开展了钻孔卸压破坏范围及抽采瓦斯数值模拟,结果表明:钻孔发生卸压破坏后,虽然未护孔钻孔卸压范围是护孔钻孔的1.3倍,其周围煤体渗透率和孔隙率均大于护孔钻孔,但钻孔更易塌孔堵孔,当抽采90 d时,护孔钻孔有效抽采半径为未护孔钻孔的1.3倍。现场瓦斯抽采测定数据表明,护孔钻孔平均抽采瓦斯浓度为未护孔的1.6倍,平均抽采瓦斯纯流量为未护孔的1.4倍,并有效缩短了钻孔抽采时间。Abstract: In order to compare and analyze the extraction effect of bedding drilling borehole under the condition of hole protected and unprotected, by considering the dilatancy characteristic of coal, adopting the dynamic mathematic model of porosity and permeability in coal and combining with the Drucker-Prager criterion, the fluid-solid coupling model of borehole coal damage-seepage was established. The damage range of borehole pressure relief and gas extraction was numerical simulated based on the physical parameters of coal seam 2 in Chaohua Coal Mine. The results show that, after the pressure relief damage occurs in the borehole, although the released range of unprotected hole is more than 1.3 times of protected hole, and the porosity and permeability of coal around unprotected hole are bigger than protected hole, but unprotected hole is more likely to collapse and plug. After extracting gas for 90 days, the effective drainage radius of protected hole is more than 1.3 times of unprotected hole. The filed data of gas extraction indicates that the average extraction concentration of protected hole is more than 1.6 times of unprotected hole, the average amount of pure gas extraction of protected hole is more than 1.4 times of unprotected hole, and the borehole extraction time is effectively shortened.
-
-
[1] 旷永华,蒋中承,邵林金. 顺层长钻孔预抽煤层瓦斯区域防突技术在火烧铺煤矿的应用[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2019,46(1):74-77. [2] 郝富昌,支光辉,孙丽娟.考虑流变特性的抽放钻孔应力分布和移动变形规律研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2013,30(3):449-455. [3] 胡宝玉. 采动条件下煤层底板岩层渗透率变化过程研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2018, 45(2):81-83. [4] 陶云奇.含瓦斯煤THM耦合模型及煤与瓦斯突出模拟研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2009. [5] 胡国忠,许家林,王宏图,等.低渗透煤与瓦斯的固气动态耦合模型及数值模拟[J].中国矿业大学学报,2011,40(1):1-6. [6] 司鹄,郭涛,李晓红.钻孔抽放瓦斯流固耦合分析及数值模拟[J].重庆大学学报,2011,34(11):105-110. [7] 王宏图,江记记,王再清,等.本煤层单一顺层瓦斯抽采钻孔的渗流场数值模拟[J].重庆大学学报,2011,34(4):24-29. [8] 邱阳, 聂琪, 刘聪. 基于气固耦合的Klinkenberg效应对单孔瓦斯抽采的影响研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2016, 43(5):14-17. [9] 徐涛,杨天鸿,唐春安,等.含瓦斯煤岩破裂过程固气耦合数值模拟[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(3):293-296. [10] 王登科.含瓦斯煤岩本构模型与失稳规律研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2009. [11] 杨天鸿,徐涛,刘建新,等.应力-损伤-渗流耦合模型及在深部煤层瓦斯卸压实践中的应用[J].岩土力学与工程学报,2005,24(16):2900-2905. [12] 尹光志,李铭辉,李生舟,等.基于含瓦斯煤岩固气耦合模型的钻孔抽采瓦斯三维数值模拟[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(4):535-541. [13] 尹光志,王登科,张东明,等.含瓦斯煤岩固气耦合动态模型与数值模拟研究[J].岩土工程学报,2008,30(10):1430-1436. [14] 张凤捷,吴宇,茅献彪,等.煤层气注热开采的热-流-固耦合作用分析[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2012,29(4):505-510. [15] 韩建新.基于应变软化模型的岩体峰后变形特性[D].济南:山东大学,2012. [16] 郭平,曹树刚,张遵国,等.含瓦斯煤体固气耦合数学模型及数值模拟[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(2):330-335. -
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 徐遵玉. 构造煤层水力造穴卸压增透瓦斯抽采技术体系与应用. 中国矿业. 2023(08): 95-101 . 百度学术
2. 刘旭东,范酒源,王刚,鞠爽,马祖杰. 急倾斜特厚煤层高压水力“割-压”钻孔周围煤体润湿范围演化规律研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2022(01): 20-26 . 本站查看
3. 崔啸,郭立稳,张嘉勇,贾静. 煤层膨胀增透材料放热对煤体影响范围研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2021(01): 6-10 . 本站查看
4. 梁成,任浩,王伟峰. 高抽巷布设参数对采空区瓦斯与煤自燃复合灾害的影响. 煤炭技术. 2021(10): 87-92 . 百度学术
5. 陈建强,胡延伟,刘昆轮,王刚,范酒源. 急倾斜特厚煤层水平分段开采瓦斯预抽技术. 科学技术与工程. 2020(34): 14034-14038 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 43
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 7