• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • Scopus, DOAJ, CA, AJ, JST收录期刊
高级检索

不同煤阶煤CO2与CH4竞争吸附特性实验与分子模拟研究

Experimental and molecular simulation study on the competitive adsorption characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in coals of different rank

  • 摘要: 为研究不同煤阶煤层中CO2与CH4的竞争吸附机制,选取褐煤(低阶)、长焰煤(中阶)和无烟煤(高阶)为研究对象,开展了不同温度、压力及气体组分比例条件下的竞争吸附实验,并结合元素分析、傅里叶变换红外光谱、X射线光电子能谱及固体核磁共振对煤样分子结构进行表征,在此基础上构建了相应的煤大分子模型,采用巨正则蒙特卡洛(GCMC)和分子动力学(MD)方法模拟吸附过程,计算吸附量、相互作用能,以及不同气体在煤分子模型中的可进入孔的分布特征。结果表明:①随着煤阶增高,煤的芳香结构吸收峰面积增大,芳香结构含量越高,气体吸附能力越强,煤化程度高的煤吸附能力更强,且煤阶加深时,芳香结构呈定向演变,苯环三取代结构占主导且占比持续增大,四取代结构削减,二取代和五取代结构增加,这是煤大分子向稠环芳烃演化的体现;②CO2/CH4竞争吸附是由分压效应与吸附亲和力共同控制的动态过程,气体组分配比决定竞争吸附的初始格局,CO2比例越高,其竞争吸附初期优势越明显,系统压力对竞争吸附主导机制具有显著调控作用,低压阶段主要受分压效应控制,高压阶段则主要受吸附亲和力控制,低温高压条件有利于CO2的优先吸附与CH4的置换;③分子模拟结果表明,煤分子中的芳香环缩合程度和C—C/C—H键比例与CO2吸附能呈正相关关系,在不同煤阶中,CO2的相互作用能(-143.09~-128.87 kJ/mol)均显著低于CH4的相互作用能(-89.96~-82.42 kJ/mol),绝对值高出41.8~54.4 kJ/mol, 表明CO2与煤表面的结合强度远高于CH4,从能量角度解释了CO2在竞争吸附中始终占据优势的根本原因。

     

    Abstract: To investigate the competitive adsorption mechanism of CO2 and CH4 in coal seams of different ranks, lignite (low-rank), long-flame coal (medium-rank), and anthracite (high-rank) were selected as research subjects. Competitive adsorption experiments were conducted under various temperatures, pressures, and gas composition ratios. The molecular structures of the coal samples were characterized using elemental analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Based on the characterization results, corresponding coal macromolecular models were constructed. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) and molecular dynamics (MD) methods were employed to simulate the adsorption process, and the adsorption capacity, interaction energy, and accessible pore distribution characteristics of different gases in the coal molecular models were calculated. The results show the following: (1) With increasing coal rank, the absorption peak area of aromatic structures increases. A higher content of aromatic structures leads to stronger gas adsorption capacity, meaning that high-rank coals possess greater adsorption capacity. As coal rank deepens, the aromatic structure evolves directionally: trisubstituted benzene ring structures dominate and their proportion continuously increases, while tetrasubstituted structures decrease, and disubstituted and pentasubstituted structures increase. This reflects the evolution of coal macromolecules toward condensed aromatic hydrocarbons.(2) CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption is a dynamic process jointly controlled by the partial pressure effect and adsorption affinity. The gas composition ratio determines the initial pattern of competitive adsorption: the higher the CO2 proportion, the more obvious its advantage in the initial stage. System pressure significantly regulates the dominant mechanism: the low-pressure stage is mainly controlled by the partial pressure effect, whereas the high-pressure stage is mainly controlled by adsorption affinity. Low temperature and high pressure are favorable for the preferential adsorption of CO2 and the displacement of CH4.(3) Molecular simulation results show that the degree of aromatic ring condensation and the C—C/C—H bond ratio in coal molecules are positively correlated with CO2 adsorption energy. In all different ranks, the interaction energy of CO2 (from -143.09 kJ/mol to -128.87 kJ/mol) is significantly lower than that of CH4 (-89.96 kJ/mol to -82.42 kJ/mol), with the absolute value being 41.8 kJ/mol to 54.4 kJ/mo l higher. This indicates that the binding strength between CO2 and the coal surface is much higher than that of CH4, which fundamentally explains why CO2 always maintains an advantage in competitive adsorption.

     

/

返回文章
返回