Effect of weak acid and surfactant on coal pore and fractal characteristics
-
摘要: 以五轮山煤矿8号煤层为研究对象，经水、乙酸和在乙酸中添加不同表面活性剂对煤样进行浸泡实验，采用压汞法对各样品煤孔隙特征进行分析，并采用Menger海绵模型和Sierpinski垫片模型对孔隙分形进行计算分析。结果表明：所有样品的孔隙分布均呈“M”形；原煤及经水、乙酸处理后的煤样进退汞曲线产生较大的滞后环，在乙酸中添加不同表面活性剂后，煤样进退汞曲线滞后环减小；通过Menger海绵模型计算的分形维数，添加油酸钠的煤样品渗流孔隙和吸附孔隙分形维数为2.76和2.92，其他样品的分形维数均大于3；通过Sierpinski垫片模型计算的分形维数，经水处理后的煤样品分形维数增大，其他样品均减小。Abstract: Taking No. 8 coal seam in Wulunshan Coal Mine as the research object, the coal samples were soaked with water, acetic acid and different surfactantsin acetic acid, then the pore characteristics of each sample coal were analyzed by mercury injection method, and the pore fractal was calculated based on Menger sponge model and Sierpinski gasket model. The results show that the pore distribution of all samples is "M" type; raw coal and mercury curve of coal samples treated with water and acetic acid have a large hysteresis loop, and the hysteresis loops of the mercury curve decrease when different surfactants are added to acetic acid; among the fractal dimensions calculated by Menger sponge model, the seepage and adsorption pore fractal dimensions of coal samples with NBSP are 2.76 and 2.92, and the fractal dimensions of other samples are greater than 3; the fractal dimensions calculated by the Sierpinski gasket model, and the fractal dimensions of coal samples treated with water increases, while the others decrease.
-
Keywords:
- coal pore /
- weak acid /
- surfactant /
- mercury injection method /
- pore distribution /
- fractal
-
-
[1] 何超,刘伟.煤粒孔隙的分形模型与分形特性研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(7):150-155. [2] 高迪,刘建国.沁水盆地东南部高阶煤孔隙分形特征及意义[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 36(2):7-13. [3] 郗兆栋,唐书恒,张松航,等.腐泥煤的孔隙结构及分形特征[J].煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(11):103-109. [4] 李昌峰,魏迎春,王安民,等.基于压汞法的低阶煤储层孔隙结构表征--以准噶尔盆地南缘为例[J].中国煤炭地质, 2018, 30(2):29-33. [5] 王博文,李伟.基于小角X射线散射的灰分对煤孔隙结构的影响研究[J].煤矿安全, 2017, 48(1):144-148. [6] 马尚权,王科迪,许育铭.基于CT扫描的煤岩裂隙特征分析[J].华北科技学院学报, 2016, 13(3):107-110. [7] 任会康,王安民,李昌峰,等.基于核磁共振技术的低阶煤储层孔隙特征研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(4):143-148. [8] 马乐辉,李锋.九里山矿中低压综合煤层注水应用与效果分析[J].矿业安全与环保, 2020, 47(1):51-54. [9] 李栋,卢义玉,荣耀,等.基于定向水力压裂增透的大断面瓦斯隧道快速揭煤技术[J].岩土力学, 2019, 40(1):363-369. [10] 刘生龙,周玉竹,邱居德,等.超高压水力割缝在坚硬突出煤层石门揭煤预抽瓦斯防突措施中的应用[J].矿业安全与环保, 2017, 44(5):64-67. [11] 刘宝莉,严敏,林海飞,等.表面活性剂对煤体孔隙结构影响的实验研究[J].煤矿安全, 2018, 49(11):20-23. [12] 倪冠华,李钊,解宏超.基于核磁共振测试的煤层水锁效应解除方法[J].煤炭学报, 2018, 43(8):2280-2287. [13] 蒋长宝,林骏,王亮,等.酸化作用前后煤样吸附甲烷特性研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(9):163-169. [14] 李胜,罗明坤,范超军,等.基于核磁共振和低温氮吸附的煤层酸化增透效果定量表征[J].煤炭学报, 2017, 42(7):1748-1756. [15] 刘炎杰,刘超,马兵,等.提高煤储层渗透率的酸化实验[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2016, 44(2):46-49. [16] XIE J N, NI G H,XIE H C, et al.The effect of adding surfactant to the treating acid on the chemical properties of an acid-treated coal[J].Powder Technology, 2019, 30(5):940-951.
[17] XIE H C, NI G H, LI S A, et al.The influence of surfactant on pore fractal characteristics of composite acidized coal[J].Fuel, 2020, 253:741-753.
[18] 谢和平.岩土介质的分形孔隙和分形粒子[J].力学进展, 1993, 23(2):145-164. [19] 张小东,余坤坤,张硕,等.不同类型酸作用下构造煤表面性的变化机理[J].煤炭转化, 2017, 40(3):1-7. -
期刊类型引用(4)
1. 谢军，王法铨，李刚，张靖怡，王怡. 不同螯合剂对褐煤中金属离子浸出效果的实验研究. 煤炭技术. 2024(01): 190-193 . 
百度学术
2. 王奥，刘健，孙安祥. 向斜构造中煤体孔隙结构发育规律研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2024(02): 53-58 . 本站查看
3. 秦雷，王平，翟成，李树刚，林海飞，龙航. 基于氮气吸附法和压汞法低温液氮冻结煤体分形特征研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2023(01): 184-193+203 . 百度学术
4. 牛晓韩，王怀德，焦方宇. 互联网+员工教育及出入井安全智能管控系统在煤矿中的应用. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2021(20): 108-109 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 43
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 7
下载:
